May I ask a question of the moderators?
I posted this (http://www.rswarrior.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=22533 ) initially in the Modification section as this is what this is: a bike mod with pictures and an extensive writeup on my experience with the install, the performance and the vendor.
After several days this post was moved by a moderator to "Product Reviews" where it has remained for a couple weeks.
Now it is being moved again to "Vendor Ratings"
Im certianly in favor of the site being organized, but isn't this a bit much? First off, the article primarily has to do with my experience ordering/installing/using a modification to my bike (hence the mods section for the post). Secondarily it is a review of a product, although really it is more a modification than a product, isnt it? Only tertiarily is it a vendor rating, although I do include a vendor rating on it.
Lets face it, the vast majority of members are going to look in the modifications section and *maybe* the product review section to get feedback on mods done to bikes. Honestly I think this post is now incorrectly categorized as the main point is NOT to rate a vendor, but rather to give comprehensive feedback on a particular mod.
Finally, I did post a link to this article in the Vendors Rating section so that people who were looking there would know where to find the full writeup.
Respectfully,
JT
I posted this (http://www.rswarrior.com/forums/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=22533 ) initially in the Modification section as this is what this is: a bike mod with pictures and an extensive writeup on my experience with the install, the performance and the vendor.
After several days this post was moved by a moderator to "Product Reviews" where it has remained for a couple weeks.
Now it is being moved again to "Vendor Ratings"
Im certianly in favor of the site being organized, but isn't this a bit much? First off, the article primarily has to do with my experience ordering/installing/using a modification to my bike (hence the mods section for the post). Secondarily it is a review of a product, although really it is more a modification than a product, isnt it? Only tertiarily is it a vendor rating, although I do include a vendor rating on it.
Lets face it, the vast majority of members are going to look in the modifications section and *maybe* the product review section to get feedback on mods done to bikes. Honestly I think this post is now incorrectly categorized as the main point is NOT to rate a vendor, but rather to give comprehensive feedback on a particular mod.
Finally, I did post a link to this article in the Vendors Rating section so that people who were looking there would know where to find the full writeup.
Respectfully,
JT