hi everyone. i do not intend to provoke those professional marketing people who tell us to just buy the warrior, but i read a review from 2002 and i am disturbed by the message. i think the warrior looks nice; even the stock muffler intrigues me. please comment on the following -- "The Warrior earned very high marks in specific categories. When it came to rating power, handling, braking and appearance it scored all As and Bs (except for some Cs and Ds in the ground clearance and stability columns). The bike sucked in more everyday departments like comfort and practicality, though. It's like a gorgeous woman who looks good for a hot date, but doesn't cut it for coffee and the Sunday paper. Every time we look at this bike we're turned on...then we get a half-day down the road and want to turn around."