Joined
·
31,488 Posts
The Burrito map is known to run better on many Warriors. Go ahead now and ride the bike as you normally would. There is no further benefit in trying to make it not pop. Your riding style is not the problem. The bike likes rpm.
Ride it to see how it does. If low rpm is noisy then test this. In 1500 rpm line make the 19's into 17. Make the 20 an 18. Make the 18 a 16. See if this smooths the acceleration arc and reduces pop. If it does, then play with mild smoothing. The idea is that, when accelerating normally, you don't want to induce erratic fueling simply because you are slightly progressively twisting the throttle open. It can force the motor to seek and surge. So test to smooth it for times when you need to ride in some posted speed zone and cannot just accelerate through that set of fields. Keep in mind that the hard-coded fuel map in the ECU is not what most would expect it to look like. Some detuning is coded-in. However, even so, the stock throttle control on a stock setup is nicely mannered. Smooth. So it's fine to smooth an aftermarket map but the fact is there will be field anomalies because of gearing and power band.
There is an introductory help file in Documentation (Fuel Managers, Post #2) that gets into how to start thinking in multiple directions. Its titled About Power Commander Map Values. It helps tweak your brain to envision what is happening when you ride at (for example) a fixed rpm versus accelerate thru that rpm or decelerate back thru that rpm. It highlights that the map fields are applied when accelerating thru the conditions and when decelerating through the conditions.
It's a weird way to think. But to the extent it can be seen in your minds eye while you are riding normally, it helps you notice points in the map by guessing its throttle position and rpm and if it happens when accelerating or decelerating. Then you can look at the map file and effectively test small incremental tweaks in rpm changes both at fixed throttle and during increasing/decreasing throttle. Then some of the weird map values cause less worry. Others might jump up and beg for testing. RPM learning curve lol.
Ride it to see how it does. If low rpm is noisy then test this. In 1500 rpm line make the 19's into 17. Make the 20 an 18. Make the 18 a 16. See if this smooths the acceleration arc and reduces pop. If it does, then play with mild smoothing. The idea is that, when accelerating normally, you don't want to induce erratic fueling simply because you are slightly progressively twisting the throttle open. It can force the motor to seek and surge. So test to smooth it for times when you need to ride in some posted speed zone and cannot just accelerate through that set of fields. Keep in mind that the hard-coded fuel map in the ECU is not what most would expect it to look like. Some detuning is coded-in. However, even so, the stock throttle control on a stock setup is nicely mannered. Smooth. So it's fine to smooth an aftermarket map but the fact is there will be field anomalies because of gearing and power band.
There is an introductory help file in Documentation (Fuel Managers, Post #2) that gets into how to start thinking in multiple directions. Its titled About Power Commander Map Values. It helps tweak your brain to envision what is happening when you ride at (for example) a fixed rpm versus accelerate thru that rpm or decelerate back thru that rpm. It highlights that the map fields are applied when accelerating thru the conditions and when decelerating through the conditions.
It's a weird way to think. But to the extent it can be seen in your minds eye while you are riding normally, it helps you notice points in the map by guessing its throttle position and rpm and if it happens when accelerating or decelerating. Then you can look at the map file and effectively test small incremental tweaks in rpm changes both at fixed throttle and during increasing/decreasing throttle. Then some of the weird map values cause less worry. Others might jump up and beg for testing. RPM learning curve lol.
)
