quote:Originally posted by PRWarrior
Accourding to our conservative dyno the stock Warrior puts out around 73 hp and 97 tq.
let me know if im wrong but arent these all chassis dynos? meaning what the engine actually produces would be more? doesnt the transmission, xfer case, rear wheel and such absorb 10-15% of the power?
granted i know that power to the wheel is all that matters in acceleration, but when comparing hp to other bikes, you either have to compare other bikes dyno #s, or what the warrior puts out at the crank vs manufacturers #'s.
example: the warrior on the dyno puts down 73hp, and 97tq. honda says their 1800vtx has 106hp and 120 tq....
that would put the warrior at a huge disadvantage....
now, if you multiply the vtx #s by .85 (as 85% gets to the wheels) that means that what gets to the wheel would only be about 90-92 hp and 102-105tq
or much more on line to what the warrior produces.... still more powerful, but not the 30+hp and 30tq it would at first seem.
remember hp and torque from the dyno are after drivetrain losses.
if you were to take the warrior #'s at the crank it would come out to be 85ish hp at the crank, and about 115ish tq.
for reference in the may 05 issue of motor cyclist, the hayabusa on the dyno only put down 156.1 hp and 99.0 tq... or well below what it advertises at the crank